
The IPA homepage can be reached at Genzymes
Pompe Program Update Genzyme continues to make good progress within its program to develop a treatment for Pompe disease. Since our efforts are being followed closely by patients, physicians, health authorities and others, we are pleased to continue to provide regular reports on our progress. Below we offer an update on the status of key parts of our Pompe program. Clinical Trials The second trail 9study 1602) is scheduled to begin in the spring, and will include up to 16 infants younger than six months of age at the time of their first infusion. We expect to complete enrollment in both studies this year. We plan to begin clinical trials for patients with the late-onset form of Pompe disease once a sufficient supply of the rhGAA is available. Manufacturing Manufacturing recombinant enzymes is a highly complex, resource-intensive and time-consuming endeavor. The process involves cultivating millions of living mammalian cells under carefully controlled conditions within sophisticated vessels called bioreactors. Theses cells are engineered to produce high levels of the desired human enzymes. After several months of cell culture, the enzyme is harvested from the bioreactor and highly purified., tested for quality and ultimately prepared for administration to patients. When companies such as Genzyme first begin manufacturing these enzymes, they necessarily have to first develop the process at a small scale, within a small bioreactor, in order to refine and optimize it, before moving on to a larger scale. This "scaling-up" process takes a substantial amount of time, analysis, and resources. Genzyme is currently producing rhGAA on this smaller scale at its development and pilot manufacturing facilities, while simultaneously developing the process to produce the enzyme in large-scale bioreactors at its primary enzyme manufacturing facility in Boston. This effort is progressing well, and we expect to begin producing rhGAA at the Boston facility early in 2004. Expanded
Access/Compassionate Use Genzyme has received requests for rhGAA for patients who do not qualify for studies d1602 or 1702. It is our hope that, at some point in the future, we may have enough of the enzyme to make it available to some patients on an expanded access basis. At the moment, however, we must focus on using all available enzyme to conduct the clinical studies that we hope will demonstrate that rhGAA is efficacious and safe, so that we can apply for approval for medical use as soon as possible. Product Registration This document contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements including, among others, actual enrollment rates for clinical trials, the ability to produce sufficient product for development and commercialization activities, the timing and content of decisions by regulatory authorities, and risks, and uncertainties described in reports filed by Genzyme Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including without limitation Exhibit 99.2 to Genzyme's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended. Genzyme® is a registered trademark of Genzyme Corporation. Genzymes
Pompe Program Update
The CHO product
New studies
Production
Meeting in Rotterdam
Transition
In conclusion
IPA/Genzyme
Meeting Board members of the IPA, the International Pompe Association, met with key representatives of Genzyme in Cambridge, Massachusetts on April 16-17, 2002. The IPA members in attendance were: Randall House, AMDA-US; Marylyn House, AMDA-US, Ria Broekgaarden, VSN-The Netherlands; Maryze Schoneveld van der Linde, VSN-The Netherlands; Bob Morrison, AMDA-Australia. Genzyme representatives included Jan van Heek, Executive Vice President; John Crowley, Senior Vice President of Therapeutics and General Manager of the Pompe Program; and numerous senior executives involved in pre-clinical, clinical, manufacturing, science, operations, product development, and patient advocacy. We were extremely pleased with the extent of the information shared and with Genzymes candor in the dialogue that transpired. Although the bulk of the information shared was highly confidential, we think it is important to provide you with a summary of what we have learned. The following
information was presented at the meeting: Each enzyme was
analyzed and compared. Data derived from these studies
showed that the highest degree of glycogen clearance in
the muscle cells was achieved with the CHO enzyme. This
was substantiated at various dosages. Results were
extremely comparable between the original CHO enzyme,
licensed from Synpac, and the new CHO enzyme, produced
in-house by Genzyme. Results showed that in glycogen
clearance, there was a very similar, robust response
between the two products. In addition, the data suggests that there is a high correlation between reduction in glycogen content and response to the introduction of ERT. The data derived from these studies will further support the filings with the regulatory authorities and continue to build upon what is already understood about Pompe and the potential benefits of ERT. The results in the comparative studies
have also supported Genzymes decision to shift
further development from the Synpac CHO product to its
own internally produced CHO derived enzyme. This step
will allow Genzyme not only to gain better control of
production but is also expected to yield more mature
enzyme in a shorter period of time. Shifting to the
Genzyme produced CHO should ultimately lead to an
increased supply of the drug, thus pursing best path
forward for clinical and commercial use. Genzymes development of the
Novazyme NZ-1001 product, as a potential next-generation
therapy for Pompes disease, is proceeding and
continues to be in pre-clinical development. It is
intended that Novazyme's science, which focuses on
targeting and uptake of enzyme, will continue to serve as
a central component in the efforts to develop improved
second-generation versions of the Pompe ERT, improve upon
some of their current marketed products, as well as help
to develop new therapies for the treatment of additional
lysosomal storage disorders. To date Genzyme has been able to produce only enough enzyme for those patients participating in the current clinical studies. Genzymes Vice President of Manufacturing presented the plan for up-scaling the production of enzyme to provide enough product to support additional clinical studies and to work toward the goal of an expanded access program for patients severely affected and who do not meet future trial criteria. To date enzyme has been
produced in several 90-liter bioreactors and is currently
being up-scaled into 160 liter bioreactors. Genzyme
has purchased a 2000-liter bioreactor (in excess of $5
million-US) which should be online by the end of the
year. In 2003 they will have a second 2000-liter
bioreactor producing enzyme. It is important to
point out that each time production is up-scaled into a
larger bioreactor, Genzyme must demonstrate to the
regulating authorities that the new process does not
change the make-up of the enzyme; thus, increasing supply
is a timely process. Genzyme will continue
to supply the Synpac CHO product to patients
participating in the extension of clinical trials of this
product as it has done with patients receiving the
transgenic enzyme. Eventually, all study participants
will be transitioned to the Genzyme produced CHO enzyme.
This will occur only after additional laboratory testing
is done to determine safety and equivalency of dosage,
and after in-depth discussions with each patients
physicians has been completed. Genzyme also presented
their clinical trial plan, designed to be the swiftest
path forward to obtaining approval and bringing treatment
to patients worldwide. The initiation of clinical trials
will depend on the success of their production efforts
and on the approval by the regulating authorities. They
are anticipating the launch of several overlapping trials
in the second half of 2002. They are planning on
conducting extended and pivotal infantile trials, as
well as trials including delayed onset patients
(patients not diagnosed with the classical infantile form
of Pompe). If approved, the future trials will be
utilizing the Genzyme internal CHO enzyme. They are
planning for the studies to be conducted in several
centers between the US and Europe. The inclusion
criteria has not yet been finalized, and will not be
considered finalized and therefore made public -
until regulatory approval to begin enrollment has been
granted. This is because, that until approval is
granted to begin enrollment, every detail regarding their
plan is up for discussion and could possibly need to be
altered to comply with regulatory concern. At the conclusion of these meetings, all of us in attendance felt that there had been much accomplished in the last several months. We also believe that Genzyme is doing everything in their power to develop ERT as quickly as possible. What we have learned is that there are so many more factors in developing an ERT than we previously recognized. Although it seems like a long waiting period, right now, for the next set of studies, it should bring an approved treatment to all patients in an overall shorter amount of time. We recognize the
importance of the comprehensive studies conducted by
Genzyme in order to compare all forms of Pompe enzymes.
Data shared with us, that was derived from this study,
substantiates Genzymes claim that they are pursuing
the most efficient pathway to commercialization. This is
based not only on manufacturing considerations, but on
clinical analysis as well. This most important data will
hopefully expedite both ERT and reimbursement approval. In moving forward, we
will continue to develop the Pompe public awareness
program that is so important and about which many of you
have voiced concerns. We are working to develop a plan of
action for the IPA and our member organizations. We will
share more detailed information on this front when the
plan is more refined (in the next several weeks). In
addition, we will continue to keep the dialogue open with
Genzyme through the bi-monthly teleconferences and will
provide you with updates of those conversations. We all agree that this meeting was a step forward in working together for what we all desire most .a safe, effective, and rapid treatment for all Pompe patients. Following is a letter sent to the IPA by Jan van Heek, Executive Vice President of Genzyme, for release prior to the VSN Pompe Patient Conference which took place on March 9, 2002. in the Netherlands. Dear Friends, On Saturday, March 9th, 2002, I will be speaking at the VSN (The Dutch Muscular Dystrophy Association, Vereniging Spierziekten Nederland) Annual Patient Conference in The Netherlands. At the conference I will provide a general overview of Genzyme, focusing on our plans to move forward with the development of ERT (Enzyme Replacement Therapy) for Pompe disease. In an effort to keep you informed I would like to share with you some of the highlights of my presentation. First, thank you for your patience over the last six months as we have made dramatic and significant advancements in the Pompe development program. Genzyme has fundamentally reorganized the structure, organization and leadership of Genzymes global Pompe efforts. Twelve key members from the executive teams of Genzyme and Novazyme (a fully owned subsidiary of Genzyme as of 11/15/01) have formed the PLT (Pompe Leadership Team), chaired by John Crowley. We have engaged the best and the brightest individuals in the PLT to move this program forward as quickly as possible. The PLT sets the strategic direction and is responsible for making operational decisions with respect to all aspects of the Pompe program, including: pre-clinical, manufacturing, clinical, regulatory, and business, along with input from Genzymes senior executives. We truly believe that 2002 will finally mark the year of change for the future of Pompe patients worldwide. In the past, one of the vexing problems has been limited supply of the protein for ERT. We have made significant improvements in both the quantity and quality of enzyme production over the past months. We have transitioned all enzyme production into Genzymes own manufacturing facilities and have much more control over enzyme quality, consistency and quantity. We are confident that our manufacturing process changes will ensure adequate product supply in the future. We will soon be meeting with the regulatory authorities to discuss specific details of the next clinical studies of our CHO cell line product in different patient groups. The specific numbers of patients and inclusion criteria have not yet been presented to the regulatory authorities and therefore, are not yet finalized. Presently, we plan that this will be a multi-center, international trial, with sites in both Europe and the United States. We will disclose more details about the inclusion criteria, specific timeline and overall design of the trial when we receive approval from the regulatory authorities. We anticipate enrolling patients into the new trials as soon as we conclude our discussions with the regulatory authorities. Please note that the safety and efficacy of our CHO cell line ERT for Pompe disease has not yet been established in large clinical studies. As part of this aggressive development plan we plan to accumulate a strong package of pre-clinical and clinical evidence to present to the regulatory authorities in the future. In closing, I would like to emphasize that our goal is to have both an approved and reimbursed product available to all patients around the world. To achieve this task we need to work together to generate a greater awareness about the life-threatening affects of Pompe disease. Many patients ask what they can do to help. My response is to ask you to work within your local areas to generate public interest stories focused on Pompe. The more we can raise awareness and recognition of Pompe disease. There is still much work to be done, but by working together we can ensure that the future for individuals and families affected by Pompe will be bright. At this time I respectfully ask for your continued patience for several more weeks until our discussions with the regulatory authorities are concluded. At that time we will share with you the approved clinical path forward for 2002. In the meantime please direct any questions you may have to Sara Den Besten, Senior Manager of Patient Advocacy (email: sdenbesten@novazyme.com - phone: (609) 683 4400 x119). Sincerely, Jan van Heek (Released March 5, 2002) Mr. van Heek was unable to attend the VSN Conference on March 9, 2002, as initially planned. Philippe van Holle and Dr. Cabri addressed the group in his absence. Letter from Randall
House, IPA Chairman to Pompe Patients IPA Board
Meeting-----February
18-19, 2002 The first official IPA Board Meeting occurred in Rotterdam, The Netherlands on Feb. 18-19, 2002. Future agendas were planned and the following committees were formed:
Issues discussed were:
IPA Patient Questionnaire*: -------------------------------------------- *The purpose of the questionnaire is to gather data in order to classify patients by onset, symptoms, muscle strength, respiratory functions, family history, progression of the disease, mutation, etc. Patient confidentiality will be maintained by a coding system which will allow the IPA to provide equal access of statistical data to researchers, medical institutions, and corporations involved in Pompe research and treatment. The information on the questionnaire will help researchers learn more about the progression of the disease in order to "fit" patients into categories based on similarities. This will help researchers determine the "path" of illness and the progression of the disease and thereby maximize the efficiency of ERT and future treatments. Participation or non-participation in the questionnaire study will in no way influence a patients participation in clinical trials for Pompe's disease. The questionnaire was developed mainly through the endeavors of Dr. C. Loosen, M.D., Ph.D., Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Dr. Loonen, a pediatric neurologist, is an expert in the field. She has been involved in Pompe research for over 30 years and has published numerous articles on the disease. -------------------------------------------- Following is a summary of the meeting--February 18-19, 2002 by Alan Muir (ASGD-UK):
During the evening of the 18th,
Dr. Ans van der Ploeg and Dr. Arnold Reuser were invited
to talk about the on-going clinical trials, and Dr.
Patrick Cabri, Genzyme Europe, gave a presentation on the
ERT registration process in Europe.
|
IPA--International
Pompe Association The first IPA Conference was held on July 2-4, 1999, in Naarden, the Netherlands. The meeting was attended by over 60 participants from 11 countries which included members of the medical and scientific community, patient organizations and industry. Presentations included a historical overview of Pompes disease, ongoing research in enzyme replacement and gene therapy, and presentations from patient organizations. Randall H. House, president of AMDA (USA), chaired the first days proceedings. Y.S. Poortman, president of VSN (the Netherlands) opened the conference and welcomed the guests. The opening presentation was given by Dr. M.C.B. Loonen. Dr. Loonen served as Head of the Child Neurology Department of the Academic Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands, from 1971 until retirement in 1995. Her thesis entitled, "The variability of Pompes Disease. A clinical, biochemical and genetic study of glycogen storage disease type 2, or acid maltase deficiency", appeared in 1979. Dr. Loonens presentation gave a historical overview of Pompes disease from its initial description by J.C. Pompe, a Dutch pathologist in 1932; the discovery of lysosomes in 1955 by Christian de Duve (et al); the discovery by H. G. Hers (et al) that glycogen storage was caused by the deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme, acid alpha-glucosidase and his unsuccessful attempt at enzyme replacement therapy in 1963; the 1964 demonstration by Baudhuin (et al) which showed that glycogen stored in the liver of Pompe patients was present mainly within the lysosomes. In 1965 it was recognized that there are also "late-onset" forms of Pompes disease. Although presently retired, Dr. Loonen is still involved in the clinical trials for enzyme replacement therapy currently underway at Sophia Childrens Hospital in Rotterdam. Dr. M.G.E.M. Ausems, Clinical Geneticist and Head of Genetic Counseling in the Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, based her presentation on her publication "The frequency of Glycogen Storage Disease type II in the Netherlands; implications for diagnosis and genetic counseling." (Ausems MEM, Verbiest J. Herman MMP, it al; Eur J Hum Genet in press). Since 1995 she has been involved in studies on the frequency of Pompes disease and genotype-phenotype correlations of the disease in close collaboration with Dr. Reuser, Dr. van der Ploeg and Prof. Dr. J.H.H. Wokkel, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. Dr. Ausemss data predicts that frequency of GSD II is 1 in 40,000 in the Dutch population as opposed to the frequently quoted figure of 1 in 100,000. A recent study on the carrier frequency by Frank Martiniuk, Ph.D., New York University Medical Center (USA), also indicated a disease frequency of 1 in 40,000, based on his study of the general population in New York (Martiniuk F, Chen A, Mack A et al. Carrier frequency for glycogen storage disease type II in New York and estimates of affected individuals born with the disease. AM J Med Genet 1998; 79:69-72.) Dr. Ausems concluded, "Our results suggest that the world wide frequency of GSD II must be higher than 1 in 100,000 and that the birth prevalence of adult GSD II is two times higher than that of infantile GSD II. Prof. Dr. John J. Hopwood, Deputy Head of the Chemical Pathology Services and Head of the Lysosomal Disease Research Unit, Womens and Childrens Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, stressed the importance of joining together all LSD, lysosomal storage disorders (of which there are 40), to broaden the patient base and thereby, bring this category of disorders to the foreground. Based on his research he has found that LSD affects approximately 1 in 5,000. For over 20 years Dr. Hopwoods research has been linked to the provision of a diagnostic service and the development of therapy for patients with LSD. Specifically toward GSD II he stated, "We have been developing new methodology to achieve fast, inexpensive and non-invasive procedures for the early detection and diagnosis of GSD II in individuals from newborns to adult populations," but he went on to say that diagnosis of GSD II using blood samples is complicated by the presence of other alpha-glucosidase activities. Arnold J.J. Reuser, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Cell Biology, Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands, also made a historical presentation on Pompes disease. Dr. Reuser has been involved in Pompe research since 1973. Throughout the 80s and 90s, he was involved in the biosynthesis and structure of acid alpha-glucosidase, the cloning of the acid alpha-glucosidase gene, mutation analysis, and the development of a mouse model for Pompes disease. All of these endeavors have lead to the commencement of clinical trials in enzyme replacement therapy for Pompes disease currently in progress at Sophia Childrens Hospital in Rotterdam. Dr. Reuser joined Professor Hans Buller, director of Sophia Childrens Hospital Rotterdam, and Dr. Ans van der Ploeg, principal investigator, who recently expressed their optimism about the progress of the trial. Dr. Reuser concluded by ".......highlighting the role of the patients, patient organizations and charities that have kept the process alive. Our research team.......has experienced tremendous support.......from patients.......(and) patient organizations and charities (such as), the AGSD (UK), the AMDA (USA), the Prinses Beatrix Fonds and the Sophia Foundation, in particular, .......(who) have made financial contributions to keep us going." He closed his speech by commending the formation of the IPA. Dr. Andrea Amalfitano, Duke University
Medical Center (USA) made a presentation entitled
"Therapy for GSD-II; Enzyme based therapeutics and
novel gene therapy approaches." Dr. A.T. van der Ploeg, Sophia
Childrens Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands, gave
her presentation entitled "Enzyme therapy for
Pompes disease" on the last day of the
conference. Presentations were also made by industry representatives: "A Transgenic Approach to Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Pompe Patients" was jointly made by A. Vos, Ph.D., Pharming/Genzyme LLC (Netherlands); J. Dalle, MSc, Pharming NV (Belgium); A. Curtis, MBA, Genzyme Corp (USA). "The Challenges of rhGAA Manufacture " was the title of the presentation made by Blythe Devlin,Ph.D., Synpac (N.C.) Inc. Patient organization presentations included the following: "Knowledge is power" and "The importance of good information," Kevin ODonnell, Ph.D., AGSD (UK); "Forming a national Pompe group, our experience," Marylyn House, AMDA (USA); "The International Pompe Association, position, objectives, policy and activities," Ysbrand Poortman, VSN (Netherlands); "Developments in the area of Pompes disease," Haske van Veenendal, VSN (Netherlands); "Funding treatment before the government subsidy approvals," Robert Morrison, MDA (Australia); "Legal procedures regarding the International Pompe Association," Helmut Erny, SHG Glycogenose Deutschland eV(Germany) Maryze Schoneveld van der Linde, representative of VSN, presented a moving autobiographical portrait of a Pompe patients endurance of this progressive debilitating disease. Maryze has struggled with the juvenile form of the disease for over 20 years. She was diagnosed with the disease at the age of 8. Her speech was entitled "From patient initiative to treatment." Ria Broekgaarden, VSN, and Randall House, AMDA, co-chaired the second days events. Thomas Schaller, SHG Glykogenose Deutschland (Germany) chaired the final days session. A closed session to formulate and discuss IPA objectives was co-chaired by Randall House and Ysbrand Poortman and included only members of patient groups. Mr. House summarized the committee report at the general meeting on the final day. |
The IPA homepage can be reached at: http://www.worldpompe.org |
|
© AMDA, Acid Maltase Deficiency Association, Inc. 1997 |